(Clint Siegner, Money Metals News Service) The effort to squeeze silver shorts may appear to have fizzled, but naked short sellers are as vulnerable as ever.
Silver futures prices are entering backwardation. That is a bad omen for anyone betting on lower silver prices.
Backwardation happens very rarely, but this condition has been a reliable indicator that higher prices are on the way each time it has occurred over the past decade.
In the futures market, silver prices generally go up based on how far away the delivery month is. Most of the time, prices for future delivery are higher than today’s spot price, i.e. the price for delivery now. There is a cost of carry – primarily driven by storage fees and opportunity cost of funds – when it comes to holding physical silver bars.
One way to think of it is that sellers build in the cost of storage to the price – and buyers of futures contracts must agree to pay increasingly higher prices the further in the future they wish to take delivery.
However, with all that said, the silver market isn’t functioning normally at the moment. The higher prices being paid for delivery of bars today is an indication of short supply.
It also may imply that investors don’t have as much confidence they will be able to get delivery later.
If investors felt sure the bars would be there, they could simply buy a futures contract for the lower price and stand for delivery.
But market participants are weighing the risk of delivery defaults, or cash settlements, more heavily. Many are paying up to get bars now for a variety of reasons.
Periods of backwardation in precious metals are relatively rare. The chart below shows just three periods of a silver backwardation in the past decade as well as the one happening now. In each case, sharply higher prices were needed to resolve the shortage.
Price backwardation is not the only evidence of tightness in physical silver supply. There is more unusual activity involving the iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The exchange traded fund reported more than 3,000 tons of bars were added early in the month.
Skeptics find it hard to believe the SLV ETF was actually able to find that much metal available for delivery so quickly.
Now even those who trust the ETF’s reporting should think twice. SLV altered its prospectus on February 3rd, ratcheting up concerns about whether the trust actually has the silver it claims.
One Redditor explains the changes:
On 3rd February, the day after the huge three day inflows into SLV and the addition of 3,000 tonnes +, the iShares Silver Trust changed its Prospectus adding in three paragraphs as follows, including:
“The demand for silver may temporarily exceed available supply that is acceptable for delivery to the Trust, which may adversely affect an investment in the Shares.”‘
“It is possible that Authorized Participants may be unable to acquire sufficient silver that is acceptable for delivery to the Trust for the issuance of new Baskets due to a limited then-available supply”
Meanwhile, BullionVault reports COMEX silver stockpiles are at a four-year low. They are down 30% from the high of 141 million troy ounces in 2007.
This creates new risks for the bullion banks and others who have been feverishly selling silver futures over the past two weeks. In recent months, the numbers of people standing for delivery of the metal on their futures contracts has spiked.
If that trend continues in March, which is the next delivery month, it may be a bigger “Come to Jesus” moment than the shorts had in March of 2020.
Silver prices have been resilient in the face of extreme selling, unlike a year ago. And this time there will be even less silver available for shorts to round up and deliver.
Clint Siegner is a Director at Money Metals Exchange, a precious metals dealer recently named “Best in the USA” by an independent global ratings group.