Quantcast

Three Biden Policies That Have Increased Gas Prices

(Brad Polumbo, Foundation for Economic Education) Average gas prices recentlyĀ passed $5 per gallonĀ nationwide, setting a new record. This is bad news for workers’ budgets, and since it’s happening under President Joe Bidenā€™s watch, it’s bad news for the Democratic Partyā€™s electoral prospects.

The White House has tried to deflect blame for the insane surge in gas prices onto Russian President Vladimir Putinā€™s invasion of Ukraine. And, to be fair, gas prices are definitely not completely within any presidentā€™s control. They absolutely are influenced by global factors, and the disruption in the global energy market caused by Putinā€™s invasion certainly has contributed to higher prices.

But Biden isnā€™t off the hook. Gas prices started rising long before the invasion, and the president still has direct responsibility for how his policies have contributed to this problem.

Here are three specific things Biden has done that have led to increased gas prices.

Since taking office, Biden has taken too many steps to count to limit domestic production. These include halting federal permits for oil and gas drilling and leasing shortly after taking office and blocking drilling in a major oil-rich Alaskan region.

To be clear, these decisions will mostly affect future production. But that does still significantly affect gas prices because companies factor in their expectations about the future into the decisions they make today.

ā€œSome say that new leases ā€¦ would have taken time and would not yet be online, but even so, there is evidence that expectations of increased future supply has a beneficial impact on current prices and expectations of future supply drying up has a negative impact on current prices,ā€ the Competitive Enterprise Instituteā€™s Ben Lieberman said.

ā€œAt a day-to-day level, I am hearing from drillers that they are having a very hard time getting all the approvals they need from [the Environmental Protection Agency] and other agencies in order to produce on existing wells, and of course, new federal leasing has come to a halt,ā€ Lieberman added.

Itā€™s just basic economics that when the government throttles future supply in an industry, that will lead to higher prices both now and in the future. Biden was warned by many critics at the time that this would happen, but he proceeded anyway.

Speaking of basic economics, itā€™s well established that when businessesā€™ costs rise, that puts upward pressure on the prices they charge consumers. The oil and gas industry is no exception.

And unfortunately, the Biden administration has both proposed and implemented a wide array of regulations on the energy sector, inflicting billions in direct financial costs and incalculable indirect compliance costs ā€” plus further harming expectations for the future.

ā€œThe regulatory chokehold imposed by the Biden administration on oil production in place of a Green New Deal has drastically raised gasoline prices, thereby hurting lower-income people the most,ā€ said conservative economist Vance Ginn, who served in the Trump administration.

ā€œThis is yet another example of the high cost of big-government environmentalism when the better approach is to remove government barriers so that free markets can better let people adapt to changes in the environment at a much lower cost,ā€ Ginn concluded.

Rhetoric matters. While words donā€™t literally do anything to change gas prices, the signals coming from policymakers absolutely do affect the long-term investment decisions businesses make.

And even as a presidential candidate, Biden sent very negative messages about what his leadership would mean for the gas industry.

In just one example, as Americans for Tax Reform pointed out, Biden said during a campaign stop: ā€œWe are going to get rid of fossil fuels. ā€¦ Weā€™re going to phase out fossil fuels.ā€ Then, upon taking office, the president followed these words with actions such as canceling the Keystone XL pipeline, blocking leases, restricting imports, and pursuing regulations.

In general, Bidenā€™s open hostility toward the oil and gas industry has almost certainly curbed investment into production that otherwise wouldā€™ve occurred.

ā€œSuch extinction rhetoric, coming from the now-president, has an unprecedented chilling effect on investment,ā€ Lieberman said. To put it simply, less investment means less supply ā€” which means higher prices.

TRENDING NOW